dolores costello

CINEFILES



archive
portal

post

letterboxd
rotten tomatoes
metacritic

netflix
hulu
mubi
criterion

hollywood reporter
screen rant
coming soon
collider
nyt movies
mrqe

the wrap
slant film
24 frames

indiewire blogs
senses of cinema
bright lights

framed
framed thread

suggestion thread

View current page
...more recent posts

The LA Times and NY Times recently published articles on synthespians (all-digital actors); although both would be described as "think pieces," their main purpose seems to be hyping two upcoming movies: Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within and Simone. (By posting and mentioning those titles, I'm playing my part in the spin-cycle. Where do I pick up my check?) The LA Times piece is better, because it's more of a straight trade-mag account of the new processes and film industry responses to them. (I love that the article mentions Tron, even though I disagree that it "set back computer animation by a decade": its retro-futurist approach looks better than a lot of what's being produced now!) The NY Times piece, "Perfect Model: Gorgeous, No Complaints, Made of Pixels" by Ruth La Ferla, is more annoying, because it's hype disguised as criticism: lots of mock-profound gushing from people in the synthetic human biz, with the obligatory quote from a culture-studies prof. One concept mentioned in the LAT article is "the uncanny valley," a principle of robotics that says the more an android resembles a human, the more we focus on the minute differences between us and it. This makes sense, and would seem neatly to demolish the NYT's pitch about virtual models and actresses.
- Tom Moody 5-09-2001 4:24 pm [link] [5 refs] [2 comments]