Are we supposed to be more shocked by the idea that someone getting payed to be a TV producer doesn't know what 16:9 format is, or that he actually says the real reason why he chose it. "It looks classier!" WTF? Obviously that's the reason, but shouldn't he have made up some shit about higher quality ("real film") equipment being used. Or that it's "optimized for the HDTV market." Or some other lie that at least tries to sound impressive? I guess he's probably got "technical staff" to take care of pesky back burner issues like aspect ratio. He must be an "idea man." I've heard that's where the money is.
- jim 2-08-2002 11:41 pm





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.