drat fink
View current page
...more recent posts
Friday, Aug 20, 2004
balls in his court
didnt see it but i like how it sounds. someone must have reminded chris matthews that hes a democrat (has a conscience) and that you are allowed to take liars to task, and that that too can be good for ratings.
Thursday, Aug 19, 2004
crop circles
"This November's Presidential election will be no exception, as a bumper of initiatives addressing marijuana policy and enforcement will appear on various state and municipal ballots. Below is a summary of this November's more prominent marijuana law reform proposals."
really, im not talking about you
you know what i find is really the most annoying thing about stupid people? its that they are so fucking stupid. oh yeah, and that i have to deal with them, as opposed to say remove their corporeal form from its current junction in time and space. if only my killbot hadnt run off and joined the intergalactic peace corp, or whatever euphemism theyre using for the military these days.
memeo to self
"A newfangled news tangle"
truth or dire
"Harvey Rishikof and Michael Schrage have a really interesting essay in Slate about some new medical techniques which could be used by the intelligence community to extract information from detainees unwilling to talk -- in lieu of barbaric practices like those used at Abu Ghraib and possibly used in U.S. secret detention facilities abroad. The essay raises a litany of difficult moral, practical and legal issues, and none of these are easily resolved."
technolibertarians
technology liberation front
scandal us
"WASHINGTON -- A long-awaited report on the Abu Ghraib prison scandal will implicate about two dozen military intelligence soldiers and civilian contractors in the intimidation and sexual humiliation of Iraq war prisoners, but will not suggest wrongdoing by military brass outside the prison, senior defense officials said yesterday."
Wednesday, Aug 18, 2004
washing up
"The problem with these newsprint confessions is not that they are craven, insufficient and self-serving, which of course they are. The problem is that, on the whole, they do not correct the pre-war mistakes, but actually further them. The Post would have you believe that its "failure" before the war was its inability/reluctance to punch holes in Bush's WMD claims.
Right. I marched in Washington against the war in February 2003 with about 400,000 people, and I can pretty much guarantee that not more than a handful of those people gave a shit about whether or not Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. That's because we knew what the Post and all of these other papers still refuse to admit—this whole thing was never about weapons of mass destruction. Even a five- year-old, much less the literate executive editor of the Washington Post, could have seen, from watching Bush and his cronies make his war case, that they were going in anyway."
out damn spotter
dont know what to believe about the "outing" of al-qaida spy mohammed khan. as neither the pakistan nor american govt have much credibility whos to say theyre both not liable.
chris craft
i had a similar reaction to chris matthews as campaign desk. it wasnt that matthews was getting exercised over the spin, it was that they had misused a quote from his show. hey chris, spin happens all the time, not just when its a convenient ploy to boost your own self importance or ratings (not that theres any difference).ill give him minor props for hardblogger.