...more recent posts
Saturday, Aug 13, 2005
Dr. Hank v. Dr. Paul
... many opponents of the decision to start the war agree with the proposition that a catastrophic outcome would have grave global consequences ...
Henry Kissinger, August 12, 2005, original unabridged version in the Washington Post
What Dr. Hank fails to mention is that some opposed the invasion because of the catastrophic unintended consequences. While these questions were being raised prior to the invasion, Dr. Paul was selling shite and calling it roses and boxes of candy.
Henry Kissinger, August 12, 2005, original unabridged version in the Washington Post
In the cold light of reality, Kissinger systematically disassembles Wolfowitz's pre-war fantasies. Here's another example.
In Iraq, each of the various ethnic and religious groupings sees itself in an irreconcilable, perhaps mortal, confrontation with the others. Each group has what amounts to its own geographically concentrated militia. In the Kurdish area, for example, internal security is maintained by Kurdish forces, and the presence of the national army is kept to a minimum, if not totally prevented. The same holds true to a substantial extent in the Shiite region. Is it then possible to speak of a national army at all?
Kissinger, August 12, 2005
Kissinger, August 12, 2005
I had a powerful experience on Sunday. I went to Dearborn, Michigan which is the center of the Iraqi-American community, several hundred thousand that live in that area. And I met with a group of several hundred in the Dearborn town hall on Sunday. I raised this issue with them. I said there are people who say you've got Kurds and Arabs and Shia and Suni and Turkamen and Assyrians and as soon as Saddam is gone they'll be fighting with one another. Someone shouted out, "Never", and the whole crowd erupted in agreement.
Wolfowitz, February 25, 2003
Worse than Viet Nam. Worse than Watergate. Worse than Nixon.
Wolfowitz, February 25, 2003
Worst. President. Ever.
older posts...