cover photo



blog archive

main site

artwork

bio






Schwarz



View current page
...more recent posts

Well I said shake baby shake

I said shake baby shake

I said shake it baby shake it

I said shake baby shake

Come on over Whole lot of shakin goin' on

Ahhhhh Lets Go !!!

Piano Solo Guitar Solo

Verse


Weary old faiths make art while hot young sects make only trouble. Insincerity, or at least familiarity, seems to be a precondition of great religious art—the wheezing and worldly Renaissance Papacy produced the Sistine ceiling, while the young Apostolic Church left only a few scratched graffiti in the catacombs In America, certainly, very little art has attached itself directly to our own dazzling variety of sects and cults, perhaps because true belief is too busy with eternity to worry about the décor. The great exception is the Shakers who managed, throughout the hundred or so years of their flourishing, to make objects as magically austere that they continue to astonish our eyes and our sense of form long after the last Shakers stopped shaking. Everything that they touched is breathtaking in its beauty and simplicity. It is not a negative simplicity, either a simplicity of gewgaws eliminated and ornament excised, which, like that of distressed object found in a barn, appeals by accident to modern eyes trained already in the joys of minimalism. No, their objects show knowing, creative, shaping simplicity, and to look at a single Shaker box is to see as attenuated asymmetry, a slender, bendin eccentricity, which truly anticipates and rivals the bending organic sleekness of Brancusi’s “Bird in Flight” or the algorithmic logic of Bauhaus spoons and forks. Shaker objects don’t look simple; they look specifically Shaker.

[...]

It is here, ironically, in the need to make things to sell to other people, that the first stirrings of a distinct style begin. This is not to say that the objects were made insincerely, or that Shakerism in design was a scam. The built-in cupboards and chairs and ladders constructed only for other Shakers, in Shaker communities, are made in the same spirit as the things for sale. The point is that no line was drawn the other way around, either: what was made for sale looked like what was made for sacred. The urge to make consumer goods is, after all, one of the keenest spiritual disciplines that an ascetic can face: it forces spirit to take form. An ascetic drinking tea from a cup decides not to care what kind of cup he’s drinking from; an ascetic forced to make a cup has to ask what kind of cup he ought to drink from. By the mid-nineteenth century, “Shaker” had become a brand name.


[link] [add a comment]