yeah, perverse.OM: You're right, a collection should be seen as part of a dispersed public collection and the
dialectics between patrimony and the market are complex because of the added value — or
the loss value — of these commodities. The art object is an arm chair for the tired
businessman said Matisse, but businessmen, none of them know what any of it is worth, Bob
Dylan would say.
BN: Where did he say that?
OM: In "All Along the Watchtower." Of course we are not here to explain the world. Art is not
metaphysics, plus nobody really understands the mechanisms that determine value. The
market, which is a relationship, has basically the laws of the spectacle including the spectacle
of communication. The intelligence or the ambition of the artist will not hurt, but he has to know
how to move in a system of schools, galleries, and museums. Of course we're not talking
about outsider art. Then, he should be at right place at the right time. He might even have to
be lucky. Smart dealers, oligarchs, hedge-funders, financiers, and those who have the means
to do so are the main players, but they have to deal with the hand that's given to them, and
what they can see.
heres the video of OM w/ walead beshty.
|
- bill 9-25-2009 4:14 pm