Thanks, I went with Number 5A, under the theory that what works on the Web (gimpy, asymmetrical, hard to follow) might just be irritating when the thing is blown up & running 8 hours a day in a gallery. I want the DVD to be more calm and meditative, like a moving Kenneth Noland painting (or a less arty Jeremy Blake). Serene, but still lo-tech and stupid. The trick is going to be keeping the DVD sharp and not letting it fuzz out the pixels.
- tom moody 10-21-2005 8:45 pm





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.