When the U.S. President talks about American soldiers dying for "freedom," this is what he's referring to:
Iraq in Talks With Chevron, Exxon

Houston Chronicle

LONDON Iraq is in negotiations with Chevron Corp. and Exxon Mobil Corp. to build a new $3 billion petrochemical facility, and is in talks with several other Western companies over industrial projects.

In an interview Thursday, Iraq's minister for industry and minerals Fowzi Hariri said the discussions with Chevron and Exxon began this week in Washington and are at an early stage.

"It will be one or the other company for this new facility, not both," he said. "We're hoping to have a (Memorandum of Understanding) in place by about July."

Hariri took his first trip to Washington early this week and met with several companies about industrial projects. The other leg of his trip took him to London, where he also met with a number of firms.

The minister, who has been in his post since last June, said the issue of security was a prominent feature of the discussions, given the sectarian conflict that has come to characterize Iraq over the past year. He said he emphasized to the companies that much of the violence has been in Baghdad. "What you see on the television is real ... but it's concentrated in the capital," said Hariri.

The discussions with the companies have been greatly aided by an Iraq foreign investment law that won final approval last October, he said.

Hariri said he hoped discussions with ABB Lummus, a unit of Swiss-Swedish electrical engineering company ABB Ltd., Dow Chemical Corp. and KBR Inc. over rehabilitating existing facilities would lead to tentative agreements by around March. "This is what we're hoping for but we will see," he said.

The contract with ABB Lummus could be worth $100 million, while Dow Chemical's contract could be $40 million to $50 million, the minister added. The contract forms for all the deals under discussion would include joint ventures.

While in the United States, the minister also held talks with the U.S. Geological Survey about performing a nationwide survey of Iraq's potential mineral base. He said he "had a good discussion" with the Export-Import Bank about possibly providing some of the financing for a nationwide survey to gauge Iraq's resources.

"We know we have iron ore and we think we have copper and probably gold," he said, adding that those opinions were based on old data.

Hariri plans to have discussions with General Electric Corp. over possible power turbine contracts and with General Motors Corp. over contracts for service vehicles, such as fire trucks and ambulances. The latter contract would be worth $80 million or less.

Over the next several years, the minister said Iraq would look to privatize all of state-owned industry, which number around 60 companies. He also said Asian companies were keen to enter discussions with the Iraqi government over industrial contracts.

Hariri said Iraq was also in discussions with San Francisco-based Bechtel Corp. over engineering contracts, but did not elaborate. The company recently said it was leaving Iraq after suffering through a spree of violence that killed 52 workers. The departure of the company served as another sobering reminder of how the carnage in Iraq has scrambled the United States' ambitions to rebuild the country.

- tom moody 1-27-2007 1:52 am

I am confident that all the people who have been telling me all along that it can't possibly be "about the oil" will continue to tell me the same thing. It's just remarkable how no facts can get through the talking points. And I don't even know any Republicans! This is all from "serious" people on the left who will, seemingly, say anything to distance themselves from the "un-serious" people on the left who suggest kooky things like "it's all about the oil."
- jim 1-27-2007 2:36 am

Yeah, there was the seminar depicted in Fahrenheit 9/11 on how American companies could take advantage of business opportunities in Iraq. (But Michael Moore is fat.)
And the maps of Iraqi oil fields reportedly spread out on the table in Cheney's energy policy meetings. (Doesn't mean anything.)
The righties are more upfront that we need the oil strategically, or because of manifest destiny (I believe that's what underlies Cheney's belligerence)--whereas the DLC type lefties stick their fingers in their ears and ignore the obvious so they'll appear "reasonable."
- tom moody 1-27-2007 3:36 am

Next thing you know, they'll install a former Unocal executive as President of Afghanistan....

Oh, wait...
- Ryan (guest) 1-30-2007 7:47 am

add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:

Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.