Before I answer that, I want to mention that I've posted the last page of Paul Berman's Salon interview here. In this Q&A, he calls the antiwar movement appeasers (and says some of them are anti-Semites), and endorses Bush's war against Iraq (as much as he tries to wiggle out of saying it). You have to read a few paragraphs to get the full preachy, icky flavor of the guy.
Jim, hopefully it's not going to come to holding our noses and voting for Joe Lieberman. Bush could do a lot between now and Nov 2004 to lose popularity and a better Democrat could surface. Impeachment is another desirable alternative. Right now Howard Dean looks like the most palatable Dem, if only because he opposes the war and has more on the ball than Dennis Kucinich. But probably any of the Dems, if elected, will continue the Iraq quagmire, just as Nixon did with Vietnam after Johnson. The main priority should be getting the New World Order types back out on the street (or in jail).
|
Jim, hopefully it's not going to come to holding our noses and voting for Joe Lieberman. Bush could do a lot between now and Nov 2004 to lose popularity and a better Democrat could surface. Impeachment is another desirable alternative.
Right now Howard Dean looks like the most palatable Dem, if only because he opposes the war and has more on the ball than Dennis Kucinich. But probably any of the Dems, if elected, will continue the Iraq quagmire, just as Nixon did with Vietnam after Johnson. The main priority should be getting the New World Order types back out on the street (or in jail).
- tom moody 3-27-2003 7:50 pm