i just slogged through the whole "we-blog" empyre list read. way to squander a nice opportunity empyre list members. was that a list group or an oil painting? old concerns of authorship/ownership and commodity in art!? these issues have been well hashed out by warhol and lewitt in the 60's and again by koons, levine and prince et all in the 80's. im lost to the relevance of location in art blogging. linkoln, jim punk and the others really dont need to be dragged back down into those tired out non-issues. the list seems to desire calling tunes for dancing monkeys. perhaps they shouldnt bore the guest panelists with their mundane concerns and format defence damage. on the whole, they just dont appear well informed in art or the ways of the internet.


- bill 6-09-2005 5:59 pm





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.