the shock thats expressed as yocks - its a good thing but i wonder if you are not leaving room for computer works that have a developing shock that might come after a longer/backstory engagement rather than an immediate shock? (assuming there are such things)
take untitled translation - to wonder about conceptual flaws that render the piece questionable is great (i've got one - the indian company got paid a really fair wage, cory's unpaid intern who did a ton of the actual editing got nothin. which country has the exploitive labour practices now??) but - if i'm understanding you correctly - i still think to say that a piece fails because it lacks a certain irreverence/funny/concise profundity/etc that you're used to in his work is a bit thin on the ground.
- p.d. 6-07-2007 3:38 am

add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:

Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.