There's been a proposal for a new page here that only people with accounts can see (or: that only people who want to can see.) The idea would be to off load some of the more insider-ish posts from this page (like Thursday night plans) to some place a bit more private. I guess this assumes someone other than "us" might read this page, which is not exactly proven - still I think this is probably a good idea. Any thoughts? Names?
- jim 5-18-2001 3:52 pm

Core

i think its a good idea!!
- Skinny 5-18-2001 4:07 pm [add a comment]


  • How about "logistics"?
    - tom moody 5-18-2001 7:36 pm [add a comment]



I like both "core" and "logistics". I guess I'm leaning slightly towards "core" because it sounds cool (to me,) although "logistics" is good too, and probably more descriptive. Anyone else?
- jim 5-18-2001 7:12 pm [add a comment]


  • Somehow I missed that "core" was up for consideration. I like it better than logistics.
    - tom moody 5-18-2001 10:32 pm [add a comment]


  • "Core" is OK with me. It sounds cool because it has become a buzzword in the last couple of years. There's always "heartwood", but that may be taking the metaphor too far.
    - alex 5-18-2001 11:49 pm [add a comment]


    • how bout 'kore' ... think demeter, underground, etc.?

      by the way, cant say im 110% behind the idea. i understand the motivations but somehow it seems exclusionary. but who am i to stand in the way of progress? are there initiation rites? i think our guiding principle should be extermination of all the juice. let the rolling blackouts be your lodestar.
      - dave 5-19-2001 2:03 am [add a comment]


      • Daves Right ! It should be called exclusionary progress and yes to iniation rites.But what does juice mean these days and what do you mean about the blackouts
        being your loadstar ? - dumb and dumber


        - bill 5-19-2001 2:24 am [add a comment]


      • Yee Haw, we got a dee-bate! I wouldn't want it to seem exclusionary either. Maybe it does. The flip side I guess is that discussing that sort of stuff on the treehouse page might make others who aren't part of the "group" feel like the site is some sort of clique. Or I think that's the idea. And I agree with that to some extent as well. One fun thing about just doing all the planning out in the open is (and this is something I've thought about before, and always sort of hope for) maybe some Thursday night someone we don't know will show up (note that I always say rivington st. and nothing more specific, as I don't really want strangers showing up at my house.) That would be fun. Or not, I guess, depending. But for something like a private party, maybe it is bad manners to talk about it in public? I'm pretty split.
        - jim 5-19-2001 2:46 am [add a comment]



/core
- jim 5-19-2001 7:14 pm [add a comment]


  • Let me in or I'll huff & I'll puff & I'll...
    - frank 6-26-2001 10:01 pm [add a comment]


    • ...inhale your house in.
      - alex 6-27-2001 12:12 am [add a comment]


      • ..no, no, I mean blow your mind out...
        - alex 6-27-2001 12:16 am [add a comment]






add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.