Happy to engage in contest of laziness; don't be too confident.
- alex 4-11-2000 3:13 pm


are we engaging in a laziness contest? sign me up please. id do it my self but...we'll show those southerners a thing or two about being shiftless.
- dave 4-11-2000 4:12 pm [add a comment]


Now shiftless I find to be a more aggressive form of lazy, different contest, different lack of rules. Anyway, I'm throwing in the towel, have to go work on the Rocheblave house, but I'll be drinking ice cold budweiser, and shirking two minutes for every one I work. My boss can't control me.
- jimlouis 4-11-2000 8:31 pm [add a comment]


i just saw the response. sometimes we lose track of our place. i think shiftless gets a bad rap. or maybe its just me. i think i had it warped by its proximity to shifty. websters says shiftless is lacking the will or ability to do or accomplish versus lazy which is disinclined to action or exertion; naturally or habitually slothful. so i guess shiftless could imply a lack of aptitude but in my mind it also had a devious quality.
- dave 4-19-2000 5:02 am [add a comment]





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.