talking points agrees. not that anyone expected any different spin at this point.
Yeah, but what's annoying about the Times headline is that it vindicates Bush and the Supremes at one go. Except for the Times' sister publication, the Wall Street Journal, the other pro-Bush headlines didn't go that far. It's as if Howell and Co. are saying, "Let's see if we can restore lost confidence in 2 branches of government at a pop, so we can all get back to bidness."
|
- dave 11-12-2001 8:59 pm
Yeah, but what's annoying about the Times headline is that it vindicates Bush and the Supremes at one go. Except for the Times' sister publication, the Wall Street Journal, the other pro-Bush headlines didn't go that far. It's as if Howell and Co. are saying, "Let's see if we can restore lost confidence in 2 branches of government at a pop, so we can all get back to bidness."
- tom moody 11-13-2001 12:45 am [add a comment]