he would do what he always does, not answer the question directly. im guessing he might praise the efforts of the miliitary somewhere in there. something about "best available intelligence." i doubt theres alot of room for give and take. then the spin can take over. but it is a reason why clark is an attractive candidate.

and we'll have to see where this Plame thing goes. did ashcroft recuse because hes too close or so they could say it was independent when they find nothing?

today i was thinking that if dean wins and clark wont go for the two slot that maybe bob graham of florida wouldnt be such a bad choice. im not sure how they reconcile their positions on the war. i suppose they could say they are of one mind about the future and that bush did a crappy job of it. plus graham is another mr. foreign policy strong security guy to butress deans weak foreign policy credentials. if that could make a difference in florida plus the repentant naderites. and there is talk of katherine harris running for grahams senate seat which the conventional wisdom says will enflame florida democrats. im not sure who the dems have to run against her. graham is retiring.

maybe you need an election '04 page. or a politics page.
- dave 1-09-2004 6:38 pm


the plame thing was relevant insofar as i was imagining other lines of attack against bush. would he be more vulnerable as a result of that and other unforesable events related to iraq and the "war" on terror.
- dave 1-09-2004 7:20 pm [add a comment]





add a comment to this page:

Your post will be captioned "posted by anonymous,"
or you may enter a guest username below:


Line breaks work. HTML tags will be stripped.