Re: keeping the site empty - how would the owner be compensated? Doing it with public funds would be an incredible burden on city tax payers (billions of dollars!) just to create a tiny park in a very affluent neighborhood. It doesn't really make sense to me.
Or are you saying the owner (well, okay, 99 year leasee) should just get screwed? Yikes.
|
Or are you saying the owner (well, okay, 99 year leasee) should just get screwed? Yikes.
- jim 6-10-2004 9:53 pm