teleclysm:
technologies
of networking,
telecommunication,
video and audio



technology
blogs & fora


Data Compression News
Dead 2.0
engadget
GigaOm
Gizmodo
...Gizmodo/television
howard forums
http://www.mobile-files.com/
Mobile TV Blog
Slashdot
telepocalypse
TVHarmony


technology
publications
& news


Akihabara News
Ars Technica
BetaNews
CNET Alpha
Converge!
DigiTimes
EE Times
EFF Deep Links
ENN
Google News Sci/Tech
InfoWorld
Light Reading
Monsters & Critics -- Tech
PC Magazine
The Register
SiliconBeat
The Street
Wired -- Technology


entertainment
trade press

Hollywood Reporter


View current page
...more recent posts

I'm trying to get worked up about this network neutrality stuff. I firmly believe the big telcos will try to screw the small guy if they can. Discriminating against VOIP clients - by introducing jitter, or whatever - seems to be the common example since obviously the telcos don't want you making free VOIP phone calls over their lines. But in that case we'll just encrypt our VOIP streams and run them on non standard ports. This is exactly what BitTorrent users are now doing to fight ISPs starting to throttle BT traffic. And given the robustness of client CPU power, encrypting all our communication streams would be very easy. It would also have all sorts of follow on advantages for the user in terms of security.

But maybe I'm wrong on this? Can the telcos somehow still discriminate against types of services if all traffic is encrypted? Probably I'm missing something, but this just sounds like another arms race that the forces of control will never win. I'd like to have some law protecting us, but I'm skeptical that we really need it.

Unless they outlaw encryption? Seems pretty unlikely. Or what am I missing?
- jim 7-11-2006 6:37 pm [link] [12 comments]