tom moody

tom moody's weblog
(2001 - 2007)

tommoody.us (2004 - )

2001-2007 archive

main site

faq

digital media tree (or "home" below)


RSS / validator



BLOG in gallery / AFC / artCal / furtherfield on BLOG

room sized animated GIFs / pics

geeks in the gallery / 2 / 3

fuzzy logic

and/or gallery / pics / 2

rhizome interview / illustrated

ny arts interview / illustrated

visit my cubicle

blogging & the arts panel

my dorkbot talk / notes

infinite fill show


music

video




Links:

coalition casualties

civilian casualties

iraq today / older

mccain defends bush's iraq strategy

eyebeam reBlog

hullabaloo

tyndall report

aron namenwirth

bloggy / artCal

james wagner

what really happened

stinkoman

antiwar.com

cory arcangel / at del.icio.us

juan cole

a a attanasio

rhizome.org

three rivers online

unknown news

eschaton

prereview

edward b. rackley

travelers diagram at del.icio.us

atomic cinema

lovid

cpb::softinfo :: blog

vertexList

paper rad / info

nastynets now

the memory hole

de palma a la mod

aaron in japan

NEWSgrist

chris ashley

comiclopedia

discogs

counterpunch

9/11 timeline

tedg on film

art is for the people

x-eleven

jim woodring

stephen hendee

steve gilliard

mellon writes again

eyekhan

adrien75 / 757

disco-nnect

WFMU's Beware of the Blog

travis hallenbeck

paul slocum

guthrie lonergan / at del.icio.us

tom moody


View current page
...more recent posts



mosaicmosaicmosaic
mosaicmosaicmosaic
mosaicmosaicmosaic
mosaicmosaicmosaic
mosaicmosaicmosaic

mosaic GIF - artist unknown - 15 times
not intended for RSS readers or Safari browsers


- tom moody 3-19-2007 8:43 am [link] [9 comments]



rising circlesrising circlesrising circles
rising circlesrising circlesrising circles
rising circlesrising circlesrising circles


bubble GIF - artist unknown - 9 times
not intended for RSS readers or Safari browsers


- tom moody 3-19-2007 8:42 am [link] [5 comments]



Baby Sloth [YouTube]

Unrelated to baby sloths: I was recently invited by another blog to do some critical writing for it. I was flattered by the request but replied that I was mainly focused on my own art and music and wasn't really doing reviewing outside my own domain. (My FAQ page sort of explains why--art world damage.) I said I was happy to have anything on this page reblogged, so it wasn't really a no. The person who emailed definitely took it as a "no," though. There is much good writing about art on the Net (as well as crap) that's yours for the asking--I don't know why it should have to "originate" on the site that publishes it. What's wrong with a collage of writing? Kathy Acker-like. Some blog items don't get picked up because they're too "controversial" (woo, scary). I appreciate someone "having my back" occasionally, as they say in the Army, when I go out on a limb and...express an opinion. Paddy Johnson could probably use a pat for daring to... have guts. (She called Queen Roberta a bad writer! No one in the New York art world ever stands up to the Queen and Jer.)

- tom moody 3-19-2007 8:38 am [link] [add a comment]



Extensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - Color
Extensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - Color
Extensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - Color
Extensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - Color
Extensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - ColorExtensible Cluster - Color

not intended for RSS readers; no guarantees on Safari

- tom moody 3-16-2007 11:27 pm [link] [7 comments]



From Jim Henley:
Hillary Clinton says our withdrawal from Iraq should involve leaving 50,000 troops in Iraq that will continue to conduct combat operations and will continue to need supplying along Iraqi roads and continue to need a massive helicopter and jet presence in Iraq’s skies. The only thing they won’t do, somehow, is involve themselves in Iraq's civil war, which will be quite some trick given that one side of the civil war goes out of its way to attack American troops and the Iraqi government and its constituents; this is also the side we'll continue to conduct combat operations against. The other side is the Iraqi government and its constituents; elements of that side sometimes attack us too, though from what I can tell they mostly only do this when we step all in their shit.

You might wonder what the Iraqi government thinks of this grand strategy of the Senator's. The only reasonable interpretation of her statements as reported in the press is that the Senator could care less, thank you. We will stay in Iraq "north of Baghdad" for reasons independent of any wishes Iraq’s government might hold. We’ll "protect the Kurds," whom Iraq's government may not wish protected quite so much, and "counter any Iranian moves into Iraq" that Iraq’s government may not want countered. We will, in other words, do whatever the hell we want in Iraq. We will run the place, but without the fuss and bother of providing security for the citizens or delivering services. The Iraqi government is welcome to "get its act together" if it wishes, which should be easy to do when a foreign country is maintaining 50,000 troops who will act with impunity anywhere within its territory.

There are two words for this kind of military posture: occupation and war. We have those now. Senator Clinton says we should keep having them until the last date has dried into the last fig. She’s just going to try to make it a little quieter for us, and be a little lazier about it.
Looks like another "hold your nose and vote" scenario come '08, barring some miracle.

Update: Juan Cole further demolishes Clinton's justifications for continued US occupation.

- tom moody 3-16-2007 9:24 pm [link] [add a comment]



Gymnast Turtle via 4Chan

via 4Chan

- tom moody 3-15-2007 8:09 am [link] [4 comments]



This just popped up in the Rhizome Raw* RSS feed:
Public tribute for Jean Baudrillard on World of Warcraft.

Ars Virtua will be holding a public tribute to honor the late social and political theorist Jean Baudrillard. Jean Baudrillard's criticisms and view on Simulation are influential to our discussions of the MMO.

This short program will be held on the WoW Kilrogg server, 4-5pm PDT, March 17, 2007 near Orgrimmar. Please send tell to Zuluu upon arrival in-world for the location.

Ars Virtua is a new media center and gallery located primarily in the synthetic world of Second Life. It is a new type of space that leverages the tension between 3-D rendered game space and terrestrial reality, between simulated and simulation. Ars Virtua is sponsored by the CADRE Laboratory for New Media.
I shouldn't laugh at this, but now whenever I hear "World of Warcraft" I can't get the image out of my head of the South Park episode with the bloated pasty middle aged man with skin diseases who sits at his computer all day eating junk food and racking up obscene numbers of points killing everyone in Warcraft. Would Baudrillard have "gotten" that?

*Update, 2011: The Rhizome link has been changed to http://rhizome.org/announce/events/47095/

- tom moody 3-15-2007 7:35 am [link] [9 comments]



From Paul Slocum's blog comes this item about an alternative for working musicians to the iTunes store. It's called SNOCAP, started by the original Napster guy. The scheme makes it possible for you to have a "store" on MySpace (or any other page you control) and sell non-DRM'd mp3s for 99 cents, of which SNOCAP keeps 39 cents.

Downside: they want access to your bank account to debit and credit funds electronically. I'm just wrapping my head around "Check 21"--the law that lets utilities and credit card companies dun your account by "electronic funds transfer" when you send them your monthly check. (Yes, I still like a paper trail.) How'd that get passed? Oh, right, never mind. You'd probably want to set up a separate account, which costs extra if the bank considers it a business account.

Update: Jim has more on the big picture and SNOCAP.

- tom moody 3-15-2007 4:04 am [link] [add a comment]