backspin1
....backspin.....

dmtree
post
archive




View current page
...more recent posts

first family?


first family


- dave 2-01-2008 1:24 am [link] [add a comment]

And this is without the Dems campaigning in Fla.


Clinton856,944
McCain693,425
Romney598,152
Obama568,930
Giuliani281,755
Huckabee259,703
Edwards248,575

from here

- mark 1-31-2008 12:43 am [link] [add a comment]

On the Democratic side, Clinton beat rival Barack Obama in a tight Nevada contest. She won the popular vote but Obama won more delegates. (???) I guess I need a civics lesson.
- jimlouis 1-20-2008 4:15 pm [link] [10 comments]

the other night coward fineman could not stop gushing about tim russerts skill and fearsomeness as an interviewer and that hillary was brave to submit to an hour in his presence. judge for yourself right now but dont look directly into his eyes or you may not live to comment again.

- dave 1-13-2008 6:30 pm [link] [add a comment]

Here's a comment to a Matt Yglesais post, with an excerpt from Matt's post in italics:

That said, all the available evidence points to there being more people with friendly feelings toward Obama than there are with friendly feelings toward Hillary.

OTOH, there are greater limits to the grossest ways in which the Republican candidates can dog whistle on HRC than on Obama. Republicans weren't going to get the black vote anyway. The main reason to seem friendly to black voters is to reassure white female voters (or so I think Rove said). But attacking HRC on dog whistle gender grounds seems at least as likely to cost Republicans those white women voters, whom they currently win by (I think) 10%, as attacking Obama on race-related dog whistle grounds. Even K-Lo gets irritated by some of the gender related HRC-bashing, and occassionally gets frustrated by the lack of Republican female politicians.

I don't think the issue is as clear cut as you're making it out to be.
This isn't making me change my mind, but this is the first argument for Clinton vs. Obama that has made any sense at all to me. What do you guys think?

Overall I still say that since Clinton is stronger with the dem base, and Obama is stronger with independents, he's a better candidate in the general election since the base is going to vote for whoever the dem nominee is anyway, while the independents can easily break the other way (or just split or just stay home) if it's Clinton.
- jim 1-10-2008 11:38 pm [link] [6 comments]

NH results



Clinton112,238
Obama104,757
McCain88,447
Romney75,202
Edwards48,666
Huckabee26,760
Giuliani20,387
Paul18,276
Richardson13,245
Kucinich3,912
Thompson2,884
Hunter1,220
Gravel402


- mark 1-10-2008 5:28 am [link] [2 comments]

must say im not that put off by dowds column as everyone else seems.

- dave 1-09-2008 10:31 pm [link] [add a comment]



have to admit gobsmacked is not the first word that comes to mind.
- dave 1-09-2008 9:42 pm [link] [2 comments]

New Hampshire election results broken down by town. Pretty nice.

- jim 1-09-2008 4:48 am [link] [10 comments]

dionne distills.

- dave 1-08-2008 9:09 pm [link] [add a comment]






[home] [subscribe] [login]
you're soaking in it.